Is Twitter the start of Web 3.0?

The World Wide Web. You can find recipes, connect with old class mates and buy practically anything. There seems to be every bit of information available you could possibly want, and more. In fact there seems to be too much information. Web statistics seem to be showing that the number of failed searches, that is where someone types a term in a search engine and doesn’t find what they are looking for or gives up before they do, is on the increase. Fear not. The guys at the top of internet pecking order are already talking about, and planning, the Semantic Web, or Web 3.0, and it is meant to help us make sense of all of this data.

So what is Web 3.0 and what does it have to do with Twitter? To explain I’ll start back a few years…

Web 1.0

The beginning of the world wide web, which was really the internet for the masses, was all about links to pages. You would read a webpage and it would contain a link to another web page that you would then visit if you clicked on it. In this way you could “surf the web” and end up in all sorts of strange places. Very quickly this became pretty confusing as the amount of pages increased… until Google came along anyway.

Web 2.0

A few years ago social networking burst onto the scene. This evolution gave users the ability to connect to other users directly and edit the content of certain types of pages to create social networks. Today there are many types of social networking sites ranging from Facebook and MySpace to Digg and Delicious. People now have the power to connect with each other, vote on any topic in a myriad of ways and exercise freedom of speech in any way they desire.

Web 3.0

The next big evolution in the history of the web will be connecting data to like data or, put another way, ideas to ideas. The amount of data that exists is only going to get bigger. For our scientists, artists and thinkers to make use of this data they need to be able to connect concepts together quickly. This is the basic premise of the semantic web. Connecting semantics. Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web, recently gave a talk at a TED conference that explains it in more detail.

So what does this have to do with Twitter? Isn’t Twitter just another social network? “A lot” and “not really”.

Twitter is, in my view, the bridge between web 2.0 and web 3.0. Sure on the surface Twitter looks like a way to connect with people and for Ashton Kutcher to stroke his own ego in 140 characters or less but it is much, much more. The real difference between Twitter and say Facebook is that, on Twitter, you are not connecting with that old school friend who you quickly realise you have little in common with and will never message again, but you are connecting with people who share a common interest. You are connecting to ideas.

As Twitter has progressed the owners have made it easier to search the constant stream of information. Topics can be tagged with the # symbol and then become instantly searchable. If you are into gardening search for #gardening and find every person who is speaking about gardening everywhere in the world in real time. Try it out : http://search.twitter.com/ . That’s where the power and popularity of Twitter come from. That’s why brands around the world are finally learning how to get involved in customers conversations, breaking down the wall that a big brand can build, and talking to individuals on their own terms.

The guys who have been planning Web 3.0 have very big ideas. It will be amazing. Technically, of course it will be way beyond what Twitter can currently offer but still it’s strange how all of us, typing messages of less than 140 characters, seem to have kicked things off. ‚Ä®Power to the people.

Comments

I had imagined web 3.0 to be much different. My research always lead to different forms of taxonomy being used by developers and designers to identify things based on something like an ISBN. I also was in the belief that it would link the same objects across the internet (including ideas and people).

I do agree with you that twitter is extremely interesting in the fact that you have at your disposal a phone book of people with their interests and location listed rather than a meaningless number. This is helping to build much stronger networks of communication. The concept of “tweet ups” has sprang from this idea because you obviously want to meet these people that share your interests.

While twitter accomplishes a number of interesting things (parsing down information, creating stronger networks, connecting people of similar interests, etc), I don’t believe that it’s any more than what people make of it. For that reason I don’t think it’s a bridge between web 2.0 and web 3.0.

-Mike Garrett

Posted by Mike Garrett April 27, 2009

I am finding that twitter has become in the last month or so more and more of a semantic web, especially with the use of hashtags, twines etc that allow me to connect with like users. Just within the last two weeks this has ramped up as I’ve met more illustrators and writers and participated in some dynamic discussions on writing via hashtags on twitter. I can sense that this trend will likely only develop further as most people I’ve met are quite excited to meet other dynamic professionals in their field and share timely and meaningful ideas and info.

Posted by Maria Lavis (@marialavis) April 27, 2009

The question is not if twitter will bring us Web 3.0, the question is what you think Web 3.0 is. I’d put it this way: Web 1.0 were the first static web pages, web 2.0 were user-centered webpages which gave a frame for user-generated-content. Web 3.0 might be open data and webservices pubished in web sites, where every single one might have a unique id so its adressable and easily usable.

Posted by ithoughts.de April 27, 2009

Post a comment

Required
Required
Optional